Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cupid"
From Super-wiki
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Anderson Writer, FEB. 15th 2010''' | '''Anderson Writer, FEB. 15th 2010''' | ||
| − | I think it would be fine to add something like "It is unclear whether [[Cupid]] requires a human [[vessel]]." Its an interesting point of angel lore. --[[User:Missyjack|Missyjack]] 21:26, 15 February 2010 (UTC) | + | :I think it would be fine to add something like "It is unclear whether [[Cupid]] requires a human [[vessel]]." Its an interesting point of angel lore. --[[User:Missyjack|Missyjack]] 21:26, 15 February 2010 (UTC) |
| + | ::I kind of figured he did the same thing Castiel seems to have done: found a suitable vessel and persuaded him to consent, with trips backward in time if necessary. This doesn't explain the naked bit, though. —[[User:EllieMurasaki|EllieMurasaki]] 02:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:39, 16 February 2010
In 5.14 My Bloody Valentine Cupid's Vessel was not mentioned or seen. This is Wiki speculation, so I won't post this on his BIO page, at least for now. We could assume that Cupids just automatically manifest when they arrive on Earth, without needing to take over a human.
Anderson Writer, FEB. 15th 2010
- I think it would be fine to add something like "It is unclear whether Cupid requires a human vessel." Its an interesting point of angel lore. --Missyjack 21:26, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- I kind of figured he did the same thing Castiel seems to have done: found a suitable vessel and persuaded him to consent, with trips backward in time if necessary. This doesn't explain the naked bit, though. —EllieMurasaki 02:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
