User talk:Crossroadsdemon

From Super-wiki
Jump to: navigation, search


Yes, sure. Although I don't know what you mean in what you said in your message; do you want me to insert/add a heading or subheading with info on Blue-Ray stuff?

Anderson54, March 7th 2011


sorry - I have changed the protection on the template now. Missyjack (talk) Yes - good idea. I think everyone knows where to find it! Missyjack (talk)

That would be great if you could add Occupation back into the template. Thanks! Missyjack (talk)

Hey - thanks for your continued great work on the Wiki. I have just done an interview with Mark Meloche, head of VFX which i'll post on here soon, and he said they use the Wiki for reference regularly, and were very impressed with the level of detail,. So great to know we are actually helping make the show! cheers --Missyjack (talk) 15:14, 30 November 2012 (PST)

Hey - yes am waiting on getting our tech to look at the thumbnail/image issue. Until then you can resize pics, but I am just trying to keep uploads to the most important images. Hopefully, one day soon, all will be fixed! Sorry for all these frustrations. cheers --Missyjack 21:51, 31 March 2012 (PDT)

Hey there - we are currently trying to get on top of and stop the spam we've been experiencing on the Wiki. If you have some time to be able to help with the clean-up, could you email me? cheers Jules

Hi - the map is showing up fine for me (in Firefox). However we are having a few Wiki formatting issues (such as with the image gallery syntax) that i've got someone looking into. Let me know if it fixes for you in a few days. cheers Missyjack

Thanks - will add that in. --Missyjack 00:14, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the heads up about the Pilot page! It was a formatting mistake, and it's all fixed now. Thanks for all your work on the Wiki.cheers --Missyjack 21:15, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi - thanks for blanking the spam pages, but in future you can just leave them? When I deal with spam I block any editors of the spam page, which meant I accidentally just bloacked you! I am trying to keep on top of the spam and we are working on a new software solution. cheers --Missyjack 04:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi - thanks for doing the AU character pages but I am going to put the info on the actual people's pages, as I think its cleaners and where people will look for info. I also think it better ties in with the 'spirit'of the episode that these were the 'real'people--Missyjack 21:45, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! Also thanks for the change - peak is probably an Australian term. I was inspired by the incredible work done by hell-half-acre on the Clothing Catalogue - check it out she's catalogued the boys clothes over FIVE seasons! All the tees, shirts and jackets. And it has graphs! She's also going to do a page for Dean's Leather Jacket. So i just had to add in Castiel's Trench Coat and of course Bobby's Hats! And create a whole new category in the Library called "Personal Effects"! cheers Jules --Missyjack 01:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Just to let you know that the Supernatural Wiki has been nominated for an award at SFX (more details on our home page). We are up against some famous fan sites like Leaky Cauldron and The One Ring. This is a testament to all the great contrinuters like yourself who make the site so awesome. You can vote here - please spread the word! Missyjack

Sure - will fix template shortly. cheers --Missyjack 21:30, 25 March 2011 (UTC) Thanks for changing the anime infobox! Missyjack

I am not too worried about using the recurring character template on characters who have only appeared once (of course in SPN who knows when someone will come back). I tend to use the template for significant one-off characters as its neat and a nice way to summarise info. But its not something I have hugely strong feelings on either way. --Missyjack 23:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi. They are all fantastic suggestions, please go ahead with that formatting. I really appreciate the thought you put into making the entries more user friendly and readable. The only thing to think about if whether we need the initial '___ in Supernatural' header. I don't mind it, but think maybe people will understand anyway that the main part of the entries refer to appearances within SPN. Just seems a bit redundant maybe. But I certainly don't have strong feelings about it and happy to leave the decision up to you. Thanks again for all your work, you might want to know that it looks like we're about to have our biggest month ever with nearly 400,000 visitors to the Wiki in the last month! This compares to around 220,000 visitors for the same time last year. cheers Jules --Missyjack 22:13, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes I think another page for the exhaustive list would be good, and keep the main table for the more significant actors. Thanks for all your work on it! Cheers --Missyjack 05:23, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

I loved the Sam always forgets pie joke! Its oen of those lovely subtle little things that they sneak in! --Missyjack 04:29, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi - no the prob with the maps isn't with you. We have upgraded to a new version of the Mediawiki software which doesn't support the map extension we were using. Skud is our new sysadmin and she's going to install an new map extension in the next day or so. unfortunately we'll probably need to recode the maps for every episode, but there was no way around it with the new software. I'll let you know how things progress. Thanks again for all your great work - esp doing the Alochol page - thats certainly proving relevant! Missyjack 13:03, 22 October 2011 (PDT)


Brigitta Page

Hey Crossroadsdemon thats fine with the change you just made to the page they look good. Thanks for the heads up an letting me know about it. Oh and on a random note how did you like the start of Season 6 I enjoyed the episode personally I'm excited to see how it plays out for the rest of the season.

From Rod12

Season 6

Hi Ashley I'm glad to hear that someone enjoyed 6.01 Exile on Main Street besides me because I found it kind of I guess you can call it funny how reviews of the Episode 1 whether its from a TV Critic or a fan of the show all of sudden went into panic mode and began critizing the heck out of the show just from one episode of a new season. I mean you can't judge an entire show let alone a brand new season just from one single episode and I was kind of surprise that not just TV Critics but from the show fans were doing that so quickly. I mean the best way to look at episode one and two is think of them as one single episode but a two parter which evolved around Deans current life and his eventual return to hunting, the mysterious return of both Sam and Samuel, the arrival of the rest of the Campbell Family and finally the mystery behind whats going on with the Suernatural creaturs. Those key story points are what episode 1 and 2 were mainly about and why kind of surprised how quickly that was overlooked. An I agree with you Season 6 just from the first two episode looks awsome and I'm exited to see how it plays out. Oh well talk to you later

From Rod12


Hi Ashley glad I could help out with the episode images they were not that hard to find there was a Supernatural Fan site I found that if you go to the gallery section of the site they have screen captures from the latest episodes in HD so there pretty good if you want to visit the site this is the Link. Oh well talk to you later.

From Rod12

Editing Work on Minor Character Pages

Hi Ashley nice to hear from you again its been awhile. As for getting rit of the History, Origin and Trivia Sections on Minor Character Pages on characters that only appeared in one episode don't worry about stepping on any ones toes or anything like that I'm thankful you were leting me know the reason why your doing the editing work and also why they were there in the first place. I'm ok with you doing the editing work I have no problem with it but I do perfer if you just left the History title and keep get rit of the origin title only but if you don't want to thats completely ok with me and keep doing the editing work you have been doing on those Minor Character Pages. Now to answer your questions those titles mainly the History and Origin ones were added by me as away for installing a outline/template on pages throughout the site there mainly on the major character pages on the site and I did awhile ago start doing it with the minor characters but I was asked to stop and just only add the History title which was ok with me. An the Trivia Section that appeared on any of the minor character pages only appear of the character had certain trivia if they didn't there shouldn't of been a section with the page. Out of Curiousity which minor characters did you remove trivia section from? Hope I answer the question you had about the History, Origin and Trivia Sections/Titles on the Minor Character pages and why they were there. Oh how have you like the two episodes of Supernatural since its come back from break and are you looking forward to any upcoming episodes. Oh well talk to you later and nie to here from you again

From Rod12

Hi Ashley with the trivia section on minor character pages like Lucas Barr which you use as an excample defenitly go right ahead and get rit of that if you want to thats ok with me and continue getting rit of the origin sections on those types of pages as well. Yea and I agree with you its nice to see the old Sam Winchester back to normal and no I don't have lj account. Oh well talk to you later.

From Rod12


Thanks for adopting the use of the reflist template! It's good to see it being put to use as you did on Crowley's page. Keep up the good work. --Staxeon 04:11, 14 February 2011 (UTC)


Hello Ashley, nice to hear from you. The pad of definition entries can take quite a bit of space, but I tend to like them as an introduction to a page, but I see the appeal of grouping them under a heading on pages with multiple entries for organizations. I know that at one time the PoD entries on the Angels page were once under their own heading, and I believe Missyjack brought them back to the beginning of thr page. You might ask her about her thoughts. Have a nice day. --MisterGlass 03:31, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

You are doing an awesome job on the anti-spam crusade :-) --MisterGlass 18:32, 25 March 2012 (PDT)

I would have just said dedicated, but either way, it's great to see that rubbish disappearing, page by page. --MisterGlass 18:41, 25 March 2012 (PDT)


Hey, thanks for helping shorten the 7.15 Repo Man synopsis. I've just posted the rest of it and it's my first synopsis so bear with me. :) Silvershadow6 12:07, 26 February 2012 (PST)


We are spam-fighting machines! Huzzah! There may be a few pages left lingering around. I know I found some that were smart enough to include categories... So beware. I think we got 'em all, though. High five! Comedicdrama 15:42, 27 March 2012 (PDT)

Yeah... It was so close to the end, and it was like... hurry! We can do it! Let's clean this thing once and for all! And then once I got towards the bottom, I started getting weird errors; and then I realized that we were trying to delete the same pages... Then I knew we were done! On a side note, yesterday a new spam page appeared. All those user pages we deleted? The users are still able to create new pages since we didn't ban them as well. So, keep an eye on the recent changes often, assuming we're allowed to keep out spam-fighting awesomeness. Comedicdrama 15:47, 27 March 2012 (PDT)

Yeah, I was doing User searches using common terms. It was kind of a nightmare. However, almost all the spam accounts were created in the same period of time. I suggested the admin adds a batch delete plug-in, which we could then just copy/paste the list of page names into it, and it deletes them in one click of a button. Until then, though, it's a lot of hunting. I found a lot of them on this page [1] starting Feb. 26, going down through the bottom of the page. It will make your head spin. Comedicdrama 01:32, 30 March 2012 (PDT)